31 Aug – 6 Sept 2026 · UTC · in progress
Unverified

Vidit Jain

@ViditJain123 · Goa · on GitHub since 2021

← back to Vidit Jain
How this week scored
  • Commits with a meaningful diff5 × 15
  • Private work we can count but not open1 × 11
  • Distinct active days2 × 510
  • Distinct languages touched1 × 33
19 base × 1.10 consistency × 1.00 range × 0.80 integrity17
Consistency

2/7

active days. Seven days at twenty points beats one day at a hundred and forty — that is what the multiplier is for.

Behind a closed door

1,362

contributions in private repositories over the last ninety days. That is real work in a real job, and it is the single largest thing a contribution graph gets wrong about a developer.

1 of this week’s counted, at a point each. Repositories outside the ones you connected still land here.

Week rhythm · hour of week, UTC
Languages this week
  • TypeScript

Ordered by how much of the week each one actually was. The first is the one you are ranked against; only the first four earn points.

Repositories this week
  • ViditJain123/ladder5 commits

Counted commits only — a repository that contributed nothing to the score does not head the list of where the week went.

What did not count, and why
  • 12Private work counts, but only up to a weekly ceiling — none of it can be checked.−815 pts
  • 2Beyond the daily commit cap.−14 pts
We could not verify some of this activity

  • Nearly everything this week went to one repository that no one else contributes to and that has no pull requests. Nothing about that is wrong — it is simply work no second person has seen.

    SINGLE_REPO_NO_REVIEW · multiplier −0.2

What you are looking at

A weekly rank, scored on work that took someone else’s approval.

Not contribution count. A merged pull request into a repository you do not own is worth twelve points because somebody else had to press merge; a commit is worth one and is capped at ten a day. Reviews you gave count for eight, which is why the top of a table is often somebody who wrote very little code and read a great deal of it.

Every score is ranked against a real crowd — the percentile above says which one and how many people are in it — and the whole thing resets on Monday.

Get your own rankevery weight and every exclusion →

read-only · you pick the repositories · we never write anything

synced 2026-09-01 11:51Z · account + selected repositorieshow this is scored →
TierUp
MethodologySponsorYour standing
MONTUEWEDTHUFRISATSUN
Score by week · last 13
2026-06-08this week
What you are looking at

A weekly rank, scored on work that took someone else’s approval.

Not contribution count. A merged pull request into a repository you do not own is worth twelve points because somebody else had to press merge; a commit is worth one and is capped at ten a day. Reviews you gave count for eight, which is why the top of a table is often somebody who wrote very little code and read a great deal of it.

Every score is ranked against a real crowd — the percentile above says which one and how many people are in it — and the whole thing resets on Monday.

Get your own rankevery weight and every exclusion →

read-only · you pick the repositories · we never write anything